• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Malloch v. State, No. 17A03-1201-CR-37, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 21, 2012).

December 31, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Even though detective’s interrogation was intense and confrontational, defendant’s video-taped child-molesting confession was voluntary under the circumstances.

Woods v. State, No. 39A05-1204-CR-189, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 27, 2012).

December 31, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

The probable cause affidavit may be used to supplement the charging information to meet the requirement that the State allege the crime concealment exception to the criminal statute of limitations.

Kimbrough v. State, No. 45S04-1212-CR-687, __N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 19, 2012).

December 20, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Appellate court may not find trial court abused its sentencing discretion based on weight trial court afforded aggravators and mitigators.

Young v. State, No. 20A04-1112-CR-699, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 11, 2012).

December 13, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

When victim had come to the fire station on her own and was being treated by firemen, her statements in response to firefighters’ questions were not “testimonial” under the Crawford Confrontation Clause rule.

Teague v. State, No. 89A01-1202-CR-86, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 5, 2012).

December 7, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Holds under the facts in this case that “a 911 recording that involves statements by a caller that were relayed from a victim [were] admissible where the victim had personal knowledge of the underlying incident but the caller did not,” on the basis that the caller’s frame of mind and lack of opportunity to reflect qualified her 911 statements as excited utterances.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 234
  • Go to page 235
  • Go to page 236
  • Go to page 237
  • Go to page 238
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 325
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs