• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Lucas v. State, No. 03A01-1309-CR-389, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2014).

August 14, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, P. Riley

Officer’s taking expired license suspect into patrol car to “review the information and decide what we were going to do,” when review could have been conducted by the side of the suspect’s auto, impermissibly expanded scope of an investigatory stop without justification.

State v. Downey, No. 10A01-1310-CR-432, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 31, 2014).

August 7, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, M. Robb

Order for return of defendant’s money seized by police was abuse of discretion as the matter was moot because the money had already been transferred, by order of a different court without a hearing, to the federal government.

Collins v. State, No. 49A02-1310-PC-887 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jul. 25, 2014).

July 31, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Denial of post-conviction relief petitioner’s request for subpoena for an out-of-state witness was not an abuse of discretion, when petitioner did not identify any state or federal law permitting the subpoena.

Bell v. State, No. 49A02-1312-CR-1026, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jul. 28, 2014).

July 31, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Odor on a person of raw marijuana, like the smell of burnt marijuana, suffices to provide probable cause that the person possesses marijuana.

Perryman v. State, No. 20A03-1308-PC-299, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jul. 30, 2014).

July 31, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Evidence of controlled buy of cocaine from defendant, which was relied on to obtain the search warrant which produced the cocaine and marijuana on which charges were based, was “intrinsic” to the charged crimes and accordingly not barred by Evidence Rule 404(b).

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 201
  • Go to page 202
  • Go to page 203
  • Go to page 204
  • Go to page 205
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 325
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs