• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Legg v. State, No. 49A02-1404-CR-279, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 10, 2014).

December 11, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Affirms trial court’s decision not to apply the alternative juvenile sentencing provision and to instead impose a standard adult sentence.

Montgomery v. State, No. 82A01-1404-CR-163, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 11, 2014).

December 11, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

NPLEx system’s records of pseudoephedrine or ephedrine sales evidence were not “testimonial” and hence their admission did not violate the accused’s Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights.

Watters v. State, No. 34A02-1403-CR-215, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2014).

December 4, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Under the “indicia of reliability” rule for probation revocation evidence, admission of uncertified exhibits not substantiated by certified copies, affidavits, or testimony was reversible error.

Montgomery v. State, No. 49A02-1312-CR-1039, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2014).

December 4, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

When post-conviction court determines petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal, the remedy is a new trial, not a trial court order that petitioner received a second direct appeal.

Smith v. State, No. 71A04-1312-CR-609, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 24, 2014).

December 4, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

When accomplice had given a sworn factual basis for her burglary guilty plea admitting that she broke into the building, her testimony under a grant of immunity at defendant’s trial that defendant was the one who had broken in, not her, amounted to reversible knowing use of perjured testimony by the State.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 192
  • Go to page 193
  • Go to page 194
  • Go to page 195
  • Go to page 196
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 323
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs