• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

J.B. v. State, No. 49A02-1409-JV-688, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 23, 2005).

April 23, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Police officer’s temporary detention of juvenile on sidewalk to investigate whether item juvenile had discarded was a handgun was a reasonable action under the totality of the circumstances and did not violate the Indiana Constitution’s search protection in Article 1, Section 11.

Woodcox v. State, No. 15A05-1410-CR-468, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 14, 2015).

April 16, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

When judgment of conviction was for an A felony but the entry of judgment was for a B felony, defendant’s motion to correct erroneous sentence was properly denied and a nunc pro tunc entry of judgment for an A felony was ordered on remand.

Myers v. State, No. 76S03-1407-CR-493, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Apr. 8, 2015).

April 9, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, S. David, Supreme

Experts unanimously agreed defendant was legally insane, but other evidence in the record supported the jury’s conclusion that he was not; as it was not shown defendant was given Miranda rights, the State could use his post-arrest silence and request for an attorney as evidence of sanity without violating his due process rights.

Schaadt v. State, No. 33A05-1409-CR-428, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 8, 2015).

April 9, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Savings clause for 2014 penal reforms does not violate the Indiana Constitution’s Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause.

Grady v. North Carolina, No. 14-593, __ U.S. __ (Mar. 30, 2015).

April 2, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, SCOTUS

Attachment of a GPS monitor to a recidivist sex offender without his consent is a Fourth Amendment search; as the question of the reasonableness of the GPS monitor “search” in this case was not raised, the Court does not address it.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 184
  • Go to page 185
  • Go to page 186
  • Go to page 187
  • Go to page 188
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 325
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs