Bar on “vouching” testimony under Evid. R. 704(b) and Hoglund v. State (Ind. 2012) also bars opinion testimony of whether a witness shows “signs or indicators” of having been “coached,” unless defendant opens the door by an express or implied claim of coaching. (Overruling Kindred v. State (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) and Archer v. State (Ind. Ct. App. 2013).)
Criminal
Sistrunk v. State, No. 49S05-1410-CR-654, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. July 30, 2015).
Double jeopardy did not preclude convictions for robbery and criminal confinement.
Ennik v. State, No. 90A02-1409-CR-664, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. July 17, 2015).
Defendant was not entitled to severance of right when alleged molestations were based on a common modus operandi and not just of similar character.
Osmanov v. State, No. 35A04-1412-PC-568, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 22, 2015).
Trial court improperly denied PCR summarily by taking judicial notice of prior guilty-plea proceedings; they had not been submitted as evidence in support of summary disposition under P-C.R. 1(4)(g) and were not part of the “pleadings” that could be considered under P-C.R. 1(4)(f).
State v. Terrell, ___ N.E.3d ___, No. 55A01-1501-CR-9 (Ind. Ct. App. July 10, 2015).
Contraband found in probationer’s home was admissible; probationer waived search and seizure rights and agreed to “reasonable” searches as condition of probation, and search was not unreasonable (applying Vanderkolk v. State, 32 N.E.3d 775 (Ind. June 9, 2015)).