• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Estabrook v. Mazak Corp., No. 19S-CQ-590, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 2, 2020).

March 9, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Ind. Code 34-20-3-1(b) is a statute of repose that cannot be extended by a manufacturer’s post-delivery repair, refurbishment or reconstruction of the disputed product.

Burton v. Benner, No. 19S-CT-549, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 3, 2020).

March 9, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Off-duty police officer driving an unmarked police vehicle was not “clearly outside” the scope of his employment when he got in an accident.

Cavanaugh’s Sports Bar & Eatery, Ltd. v. Porterfield, No. 20S-CT-88, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 3, 2020).

March 9, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, M. Massa, Supreme

Courts should determine if a landowner has a duty based on whether the defendant knew or had reason to know of any present and specific contemporaneous evidence that would cause a reasonable person to recognize the probability or likelihood of imminent harm.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hallie, No. 19A-MF-2183, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 9, 2020).

March 9, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Bank can elicit foundational testimony for a business record from a witness even if the witness was not present at the time a document was created, if the witness has a functional understanding of the record keeping process of the business with respect to the specific entry, transaction, or declaration contained in the document

Blair v. EMC Mortgage, LLC., No. 19S-MF-530, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 17, 2020).

February 24, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

“Indiana’s two applicable statutes of limitations recognize three events triggering the accrual of a cause of action for payment upon a promissory note containing an optional acceleration clause. First, a lender can sue for a missed payment within six years of a borrower’s default. Second, a lender can exercise its option to accelerate and fast-forward to the note’s maturity date, rendering the full balance immediately due. The lender must then bring a cause of action within six years of that acceleration date. Or, third, a lender can opt not to accelerate and sue for the entire amount owed within six years of the note’s date of maturity.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 64
  • Go to page 65
  • Go to page 66
  • Go to page 67
  • Go to page 68
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs