• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Blair v. EMC Mortgage, LLC., No. 19S-MF-530, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 17, 2020).

February 24, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

“Indiana’s two applicable statutes of limitations recognize three events triggering the accrual of a cause of action for payment upon a promissory note containing an optional acceleration clause. First, a lender can sue for a missed payment within six years of a borrower’s default. Second, a lender can exercise its option to accelerate and fast-forward to the note’s maturity date, rendering the full balance immediately due. The lender must then bring a cause of action within six years of that acceleration date. Or, third, a lender can opt not to accelerate and sue for the entire amount owed within six years of the note’s date of maturity.”

Collins Asset Group, LLC v. Alialy, No. 19S-CC-531, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 17, 2020).

February 24, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Lender could recover equally under Ind. Code § 26-1-3.1-118 and Ind. Code § 34-11-2-9 because it filed suit within six years of acceleration.

Shield Global Partners-GI, LLC v. Forster, No. 19A-CC-1100, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 19, 2020).

February 24, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Indiana recognizes damages for inherent diminished value of personal property.

Schmidt v. Allstate Property & Casualty Ins. Co., No. 19A-CT-1489, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 12, 2020).

February 17, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

An insurer owes a duty of good faith and fair dealing to an insured who is not the policyholder.

Hess v. Novicki, No. 19A-CT-1416, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2020).

February 3, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Trial court has the legal authority to rule on the merits of a TR 60(B) motion to supplement/modify an agreed permanent injunction.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 64
  • Go to page 65
  • Go to page 66
  • Go to page 67
  • Go to page 68
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 253
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs