• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

In re J.C., No. 20S-JT-235, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 1, 2020).

April 6, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Where the parent affirmatively waived the requirement, a parent is not entitled to dismissal of a TPR petition due to the juvenile court’s failure to complete a hearing within the statutorily required 180 days.

In re Paternity of M.S., No. 19A-JP-1595, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 6, 2020).

April 6, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas, N. Vaidik

The time period relevant to establishing a de facto custodianship excludes any period of time after a child custody proceeding has been commenced and while it is pending. After a child custody proceeding has been commenced and has concluded, however, the calculation of the time relevant to a de facto custodian determination is not tolled.

Furbee v. Wilson, No. 19A-PL-1756, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 30, 2020).

March 30, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Before a landlord makes a decision about a tenant’s request for an emotional-support animal, it can conduct a “meaningful review” to determine whether the accommodation is required; this review includes requesting documentation, such as information about the disability and the disability-related need for the animal, and opening a dialogue.

In re Paternity of C.B., No. 19A-JP-1618, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 18, 2020).

March 23, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

An attorney cannot litigate an award of attorney fees separate and apart from the client.

City of New Albany v. Board of Commissioners of the County of Floyd, No. 19S-MI-674__ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 23, 2020).

March 23, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Turn-over provision in the lease between the county and the building authority is valid and enforceable.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 64
  • Go to page 65
  • Go to page 66
  • Go to page 67
  • Go to page 68
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 256
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs