• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

G&G Oil Co. of Ind., Inc. v. Continental Western Ins. Co., No. 20S-PL-617, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 18, 2021).

March 22, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

In an insurance coverage dispute, although company’s losses “resulted directly from the use of a computer. whether the ransomware attack “fraudulently caused a transfer of money” cannot be resolved by summary judgment.

In re Adoption of I.B., No. 21S-AD-90, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 2, 2021).

March 8, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: C. Goff, Supreme

Mother’s consent for adoption was not required when mother failed for one year (1) to significantly communicate with child without justification or (2) to support child when able to do so and required by law.

City of Bloomington Board of Zoning Appeals v. UJ-Eighty Corp., No. 21S-PL-77, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 23, 2021).

March 1, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

City did not delegate zoning authority to university, but defined fraternities and sororities in zoning law based on their relationship with the university.

In the Matter of the Change of Gender Identification of A.B., No. 20A-MI-1580, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Feb. 24, 2021).

March 1, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander, R. Pyle

Parents have authority to petition to change the gender marker of their child on the child’s birth certificate. The appropriate standard is whether the change is in the child’s best interests.

Harvey v. Keyed In Property Management, LLC, No. 20A-SC-1459, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, Feb. 26, 2021).

March 1, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Altice

Under Small Claims Rule 8(c), an LLC using a full-time employee to represent it can allege damages above $1,500 and waive net damages in excess of the jurisdictional limit; setoffs and counterclaims were not subtracted from the jurisdictional limit.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 54
  • Go to page 55
  • Go to page 56
  • Go to page 57
  • Go to page 58
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 256
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs