“[A]n automatic presumption that any adult child who assists an aging parent is presumed to be in a dominant role and exert undue influence over that parent’s decisions is ill-advised.”
Civil
Sibbing v. Cave, No. 49A02-0802-CV-165, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 5, 2009)
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to permit defendant’s expert’s testimony that challenged the specific course of treatment chosen by plaintiff’s medical care providers to treat the injuries caused by defendant’s negligence.
In re the Guardianship of R.M.M., No. 09A02-0808-CV-725, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 23, 2009)
Trial court erred in denying incarcerated father’s petition to modify child support; Lambert requires that the child support obligation be based on his current actual earnings and assets.
Smith v. Champion Trucking Co., No. 93A02-0808-EX-701, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 25, 2009)
Third party settlement did not bar worker’s compensation benefits where the settlement was obtained before a worker’s compensation award had been resolved, and was in an amount less than the anticipated worker’s compensation benefit.
Knoebel v. Clark County Superior Court No. 1, No. 22A01-0808-CV-384, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 17, 2009)
Probation officer demoted from chief probation officer status was not entitled to retain the salary increase for a chief probation officer.