• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Breaston v. State, No. 20S04-0810-CR-561, __N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 16, 2009)

June 24, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Rule that habitual offender portions of sentences cannot be consecutive applies even when mandatory consecutivity statute applies.

Burke v. Bennett, No. 84S01-0904-CV-148, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., June 16, 2009)

June 24, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Mayoral candidate’s allegation that his opponent was disqualified due to certain pre-election employment was inapplicable to establish ineligibility in a post-campaign election contest.

Spar v. Cha, No. 45S05-0906-CV-273, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., June 16, 2009)

June 24, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Supreme, T. Boehm

Incurred risk is not a defense to medical malpractice based on negligence or lack of informed consent; plaintiff’s consents to prior surgeries were admissible to counter her lack-of-informed-consent claim to the extent that claim was based on failure to inform her of typical risks in the procedure.

Dowdell v. City of Jeffersonville, No. 10A04-0811-CV-676, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 9, 2009)

June 16, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, T. Crone

Jeffersonville ordinance that prohibited convicted sex offenders from entering public parks was unconstitutional as applied under the prohibition on ex post facto laws in the Indiana Constitution.

Stanley v. Walker, No. 41S01-0810-CV-539, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. May 27, 2009)

June 5, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, F. Sullivan, Supreme, T. Boehm

In a personal injury case where the amount of medical expenses actually paid by plaintiff was discounted from the amount originally billed because of arrangements between plaintiff’s health insurance company and medical providers, to the extent that discounted amount may be introduced without referencing insurance, it may be used to determine the reasonable value of medical services.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 249
  • Go to page 250
  • Go to page 251
  • Go to page 252
  • Go to page 253
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs