• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Nicevski v. Nicevski, No. 02A04-0904-CV-188, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 8, 2009)

July 17, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

In a dissolution case, trial court erred by including in the marital estate the value of a residence titled in husbandâ’s parents’ name, because his parents were not joined as necessary nonparties pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 7(B).

In re Adoption of Unborn Child B.W., No. 03S04-0810-CV-560, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., June 26, 2009)

July 2, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, R. Shepard, Supreme, T. Boehm

Biological father’s consent to the adoption of his child was not irrevocably implied when he failed to file a motion to contest in the adoption court but did take concurrent steps to establish paternity and preserve and assert his parental rights in another court.

In re N.S. and J.M., No. 32A05-0902-JV-78, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 30, 2009)

July 2, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Trial court erred by ordering that DCS pay the GAL fees associated with the underlying CHINS proceedings; Indiana Code §§ 31-40-3-2 and 33-24-6-4 require that the county, not DCS, is responsible for the GAL fees.

Washington Twp. Fire Dep't v. Beltway Surgery Ctr., No. 93A02-0811-EX-1006, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 24, 2009)

June 26, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

The employer of an injured employee bears the burden of proving that a medical service provider’s bill exceeds the Worker’s Compensation 80th percentile standard.

Smith v. Wrigley, No. 33A05-0903-CV-156, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 25, 2009)

June 26, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Because inmate’s claims were neither legally nor factually frivolous, trial court erred in dismissing his complaint under the Frivolous Claim Law.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 242
  • Go to page 243
  • Go to page 244
  • Go to page 245
  • Go to page 246
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs