• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

In re Adoption of L.D., No. 49A02-0907-CV-671, __ N.E.2d. __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 25, 2010)

February 26, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Since paternal grandparents adopting their grandchild were adoptive rather than biological grandparents, the maternal grandparent was not eligible for visitation under the Grandparent Visitation Act.

In re Committment of J.W.B., No. 20A03-0909-CV-418, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 17, 2010)

February 19, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Trial court lacked authority to order that a civilly committed person not be transferred “without ten (10) days written notice to the court.”

Terry v. Stephens, 54A01-0908-CV-419, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 17, 2010)

February 19, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Children of a parent who provides love, care, and affection, but no financial or non-financial support, are not dependent children pursuant to the Wrongful Death Act.

Harris v. Harris, No. 49A04-0905-CV-256, ___ N.E.2d. ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 17, 2010)

February 19, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Although the court did not have personal jurisdiction over husband, it could dissolve the marriage and change the parties’ status from married to unmarried; it could not, however, adjudicate the incidences of marriage. Trial court also erred by not complying with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act in the child custody proceedings.

In re Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of I.B., No. 03A05-0912-JV-676, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 17, 2010)

February 19, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Trial court did not err in denying appellate counsel for mother in TPR proceedings; even if mother had requested appellate counsel, she failed to make any effort for the purpose of an appeal and was unlikely to prevail on the merits.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 239
  • Go to page 240
  • Go to page 241
  • Go to page 242
  • Go to page 243
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 259
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs