• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Green v. Ford Motor Co., No. 94S00-1007-CQ-348, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Feb. 8, 2011)

February 11, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

In a crashworthiness case alleging enhanced injuries under the Indiana Products Liability Act, the finder of fact shall apportion fault to the person suffering physical harm when that alleged fault is a responsible cause of the harm for which damages are being sought.

Kolozsvari v. Doe, No. 32A04-1008-CT-525, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 10, 2011)

February 11, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Pharmacists have a duty to warn of the side effects of prescribed medications or to refuse to fill the prescription when a pharmacist has information that gives rise to a duty to exercise professional judgment.

Beneficial Indiana, Inc. v. Joy Properties, LLC, No. 02A05-1005-PL-260, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 10, 2011)

February 11, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

A claimant other than one identified Ind. Code 6-1.1-24-7 may pursue disbursement of a tax sale surplus in the trial court, and that equity requires that the claimant with the more substantial interest in the real estate should be granted disbursement of the tax sale surplus.

Dan Cristiani Excavating Co. Inc. v. Money, No. 10A05-1002-CT-114, __ N.E. 2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 26, 2010)

January 28, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

A series of adverse rulings against one party is not a pattern indicating bias without a demonstration of actual personal bias of the trial judge.

Inman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., No. 41A01-1005-CT-225, ____ N.E.2d ____ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 30, 2010)

January 7, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

An insurer can be required to pay prejudgment interest in excess of uninsured and/or underinsured motorist limits in an action brought by an insured for failure to pay uninsured and/or underinsured motorist coverage.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 217
  • Go to page 218
  • Go to page 219
  • Go to page 220
  • Go to page 221
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs