• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

City of Indianapolis, et al v. Armour, et al, No. 49S02-1007-CV-402, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 10, 2011)

May 13, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, R. Rucker, Supreme

A city resolution which only forgave outstanding assessment balances, and did not refund assessment money to those that paid the assessment, does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it was rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest.

Eppl v. DiGiacomo, No. 45A03-1007-SC-402, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2011)

May 6, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden

Tenant’s mere delivery of the keys is not sufficient to demonstrate that landlord accepted surrender of the premises; thus the end of the month, in a month-to-month tenancy, started the security deposit statute’s 45-day clock for the landlord to provide the itemization of charges against the security deposit.

Love v. Rehfus, No. 30S01-1004-CV-162, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., April 21, 2011)

April 29, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

A firefighter’s private email supporting a political candidate running for township trustee to a small group of citizens was protected public-employee speech under the Garcetti-Connick-Pickering test, and the fire chief was not justified in treating the firefighter differently from any other member of the general public and terminating his position.

Raisor v. Carter, No. 49A05-1010-CT-629, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., April 8, 2011)

April 15, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

If TR 15(C)’s requirements are met within the statute of limitations, then the last date to file an amended complaint would be 120 days after the statute of limitations has expired.

Ryan v. Ryan, No. 71A03-1009-DR-453, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 28, 2011)

April 1, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

The dissolution court “may issue an order providing additional terms to the extent the Settlement Agreement and Private Agreement are silent,” instead of modifying the terms of the Settlement Agreement to provide relief under TR 60(B).

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 210
  • Go to page 211
  • Go to page 212
  • Go to page 213
  • Go to page 214
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 256
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs