• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Anderson v. Anderson, No. 47A01-1104-DR-159, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 12, 2011).

October 13, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Indiana Child Support Guideline 3 allows periodic Social Security Disability payments to be applied against a support arrearage that accumulated before the filing of a petition to modify support.

Douglas v. State, No. 40A01-1009-DR-466, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 12, 2011).

October 13, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Incarceration for nonsupport of a dependent child can amount to a change in circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms of an existing child support order unreasonable.

Tesfamariam v. Woldenhaimanot, No. 49A02-1009-DR-105, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 4, 2011).

October 6, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Regarding the use of an interpreter, to address due process concerns in a civil action the court must administer an oath to the interpreter and establish that the interpreter is qualified just as it would in a criminal action.

Putnam Co. Sheriff v. Price, No. 49A02-1009-DR-105, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 6, 2011).

October 6, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, S. David, Supreme

County Sheriff Department “that neither owns, maintains, nor controls a county road” does not have a common law duty to warn the public of known hazardous conditions of that road.

Fratter v. Rice, No. 53A04-1101-CT-1, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 19, 2011).

September 29, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

The court properly gave the Indiana Model Civil Jury Instruction for responsible cause because it “closely tracks our Supreme Court’s definition of proximate cause” and although it does not contain the word “omission,” the term “conduct” includes both acts and omissions.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 208
  • Go to page 209
  • Go to page 210
  • Go to page 211
  • Go to page 212
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs