The professional relationship between the trial court judge and attorney who served as the chairman of the judge’s election committee was not so remote in time so as to dispel the appearance of an impropriety such that a reasonable person would have a rational basis for doubting the judge’s impartiality.
Civil
Berryhill v. Parkview Hosp., No. 02A04-1108-SC-40, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 16, 2012).
In detaining an individual, “security guards ‘act[ed] according to’ Indiana Code Article 12-26, which governs the voluntary and involuntary treatment of mentally ill individuals, and ‘assist[ed] in the detention, care, and treatment of an individual alleged … to have a mental illness’ for purposes of Indiana Code Section 12-26-2-6(a)” and are entitled to immunity from the individual’s false imprisonment claim.
Jackson v. Holiness, No. 02A03-1103-RS-9, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2012).
Trial court did not err in dismissing mother’s petition to modify child support, because she is not a non-resident petitioner as required by Ind. Code 31-18-6-11 and so the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction.
Person v. Shipley, No. 20S03-1110-CT-609, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Jan. 31, 2012).
Trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting expert testimony offered by a personal injury defendant in a rear-end collision case.
Bennett v. Richmond, No. 20S03-1105-CV-293, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Jan. 31, 2012).
Trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting expert testimony offered by a personal injury defendant in a rear-end collision case.