• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Allen v. Clarian Health Partners, Inc., No. 49A02-1011-CT-117, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 12, 2011).

October 13, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

A complaint challenging reasonableness of the fees the defendant hospital charged the plaintiffs states a claim for breach of contract because no price was specified in the contracts; plaintiffs only agreed to pay a reasonable charge for defendant hospital’s services, and if the fees charged are unreasonable this would constitute a breach of contract.

Anderson v. Anderson, No. 47A01-1104-DR-159, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 12, 2011).

October 13, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Indiana Child Support Guideline 3 allows periodic Social Security Disability payments to be applied against a support arrearage that accumulated before the filing of a petition to modify support.

Douglas v. State, No. 40A01-1009-DR-466, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 12, 2011).

October 13, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Incarceration for nonsupport of a dependent child can amount to a change in circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms of an existing child support order unreasonable.

Tesfamariam v. Woldenhaimanot, No. 49A02-1009-DR-105, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 4, 2011).

October 6, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Regarding the use of an interpreter, to address due process concerns in a civil action the court must administer an oath to the interpreter and establish that the interpreter is qualified just as it would in a criminal action.

Putnam Co. Sheriff v. Price, No. 49A02-1009-DR-105, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 6, 2011).

October 6, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, S. David, Supreme

County Sheriff Department “that neither owns, maintains, nor controls a county road” does not have a common law duty to warn the public of known hazardous conditions of that road.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 202
  • Go to page 203
  • Go to page 204
  • Go to page 205
  • Go to page 206
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs