• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Haag v. Castro, No. 29S04-1102-CT-118, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Jan. 10, 2012).

January 12, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, F. Sullivan, Supreme

A local youth soccer team cannot recover under the state youth soccer governing association’s business auto-insurance policy for injuries sustained when the van in which they were riding was involved in an accident, because the van was not being used in the business of the association, a condition for coverage under the insurance policy at issue.

Ramsey v. Moore, No. 45S05-1105-CT-281, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Jan. 12, 2012).

January 12, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Because the trial court’s order was not a final appealable judgment, the Indiana Supreme Court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear an appeal on the trial court’s order denying medical malpractice defendants’ request for a preliminary determination and requesting dismissal due to the plaintiff’s dilatory conduct.

Estate of Latek, No. 64A05-1103-ES-112, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 4, 2012).

January 5, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

“[T]he effect of another state’s determination that a will is invalid has no effect on the validity of the will in Indiana as it pertains to the disposition of real property located in Indiana.”

State v. Economic Freedom Fund, No. 07S00-1008-MI-411, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 29, 2011).

December 29, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, S. David, Supreme

The First Amendment claim against the Indiana Autodialer Law by an entity that uses an automated dialing device to deliver prerecorded political messages would likely fail; further, there is no reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of the entity’s claim that the Autodialer Law’s live-operator requirement materially burdens its right to engage in political speech in violation of the state constitution.

Snyder v. King, No. 94S00-1101-CQ-5, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 15, 2011).

December 21, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Misdemeanor battery is not an “infamous crime” for the purpose of Article II, § 8, of the Indiana Constitution, which authorizes the General Assembly to disenfranchise “any person convicted of an infamous crime”; additionally, the General Assembly has separate constitutional authority to cancel the registration of any person incarcerated following conviction, for the duration of incarceration.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 199
  • Go to page 200
  • Go to page 201
  • Go to page 202
  • Go to page 203
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs