• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Key v. Hamilton, No. 48A02-1007-CT-81, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 28, 2012).

March 1, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik, P. Mathias

“[A] signaling driver may owe a duty of care to a third party motorist as a matter of law when his actions result in the reasonable reliance by the signaled driver that traffic is clear.”

State ex rel. FSSA v. Est. of Roy, No. 33A04-1105-ES-24, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 28, 2012).

March 1, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Barnes

FSSA, a subdivision of the State, filed a valid lien against the property of a Medicaid recipient, had a preferred claim under Ind. Code 12-15-9-1, and was not required to file its claim within nine months of the death of the Medicaid recipient.

In re Ind. Newspapers, Inc., No. 49A02-1103-PL-23, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 21, 2012).

February 23, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Regarding whether a non-party news organization can be compelled to disclose in a defamation lawsuit the identity of an anonymous commenter, the Court of Appeals adopts a modified Dendrite test requiring the plaintiff to produce prima facie evidence to support only those elements of the cause of action that are not dependent on the commenter’s identity.

Bloomington Magazine, Inc. v. Kiang, No. 53A05-1012-SC-790, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 13, 2012).

February 16, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

The professional relationship between the trial court judge and attorney who served as the chairman of the judge’s election committee was not so remote in time so as to dispel the appearance of an impropriety such that a reasonable person would have a rational basis for doubting the judge’s impartiality.

Berryhill v. Parkview Hosp., No. 02A04-1108-SC-40, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 16, 2012).

February 16, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

In detaining an individual, “security guards ‘act[ed] according to’ Indiana Code Article 12-26, which governs the voluntary and involuntary treatment of mentally ill individuals, and ‘assist[ed] in the detention, care, and treatment of an individual alleged … to have a mental illness’ for purposes of Indiana Code Section 12-26-2-6(a)” and are entitled to immunity from the individual’s false imprisonment claim.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 197
  • Go to page 198
  • Go to page 199
  • Go to page 200
  • Go to page 201
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs