• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Erwin v. HSBC Mortgage Svcs., Inc., No. 32A01-1202-CT-80, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 15, 2013).

January 17, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

Property mortgagor and property managers owed no duty to a girl who drowned in the pool of an abandoned house.

Plank v. Community Hospitals of Ind., Inc., No. 49S04-1203-CT-135,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Jan. 15, 2013).

January 17, 2013 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Plaintiff forfeited his opportunity to conduct an evidentiary hearing challenging the constitutionality of the Medical Malpractice Act when he asked for the hearing 6 years into the case, post-verdict.

Orndorff v. Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles, No. 53A04-1206-PL-299, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 26, 2012).

December 31, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Under the circumstances of this case, a preliminary injunction based on laches should be issued against BMV imposition of Habitual Traffic Violator suspension eight years after HTV status arose.

Pistalo v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co., No. 45A04-1204-PL-214, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec, 27, 2012).

December 31, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

Plaintiff who recovered policy limit from deceased’s auto insurance company and then received an assignment from deceased’s estate of all its rights against insurer thereby had an independent action against the insurer for bad faith failure to settle plaintiff’s claim and could recover prejudgment interest and fees from insurer; reverses summary judgment for insurer on bad faith claim.

Banks v. Banks, No. 45A03-1203-DR-96,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 14, 2012).

December 20, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in modifying and reducing spousal maintenance obligation based on changes in the parties’ respective finances, even when there was no improvement in the medical condition of the party receiving maintenance.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 191
  • Go to page 192
  • Go to page 193
  • Go to page 194
  • Go to page 195
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs