• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Safeco Ins. Co. v. Blue Sky Innovation Group, Inc., No. 23S-CT-272, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 2, 2024).

April 9, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Trial court properly dismissed a third-party spoliation claim when there was no special relationship between the parties to create a duty to preserve the evidence.

Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Bd. of Ind.. v. Anonymous Plaintiff 1, No. 22A-PL-2938, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 4, 2024).

April 9, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, L. Weissmann, M. Bailey

Recognizes the doctrine of associational standing and affirms the trial court’s finding that plaintiffs are entitled to a preliminary injunction regarding the abortion law, but remands for a more narrowly tailored injunction.

Cooley v. Cooley, No. 23S-DN-245, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 20, 2024).

March 25, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Trial courts have broad statutory authority to order a security or other guarantee, when necessary, to secure the division of property in a dissolution of marriage; the trial court properly required husband to obtain and subsidize a life insurance policy on his retirement benefits.

D.H. v. Common Wealth Apts., No. 23A-EV-1404, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 22, 2024).

March 25, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Bailey, M. May

It is still required by the Coronavirus Economic Stabilization Act (“CARES Act”) that landlords receiving federal housing subsidies must give renters a 30-day notice to vacate before initiating eviction proceedings.

Bardonner v. Bardonner, No. 23A-DC-1393, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 12, 2024)

March 18, 2024 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Parent with legal custody of child has the exclusive authority to dictate child’s religious training. Parent’s decision that child does not participate in the other parent’s church does not violate the other parent’s 1st Amendment rights.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to page 21
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs