• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

T.P. Orthodontics, Inc. v. Kesling, No. 46S03-1405-MI-337, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 3, 2014).

September 4, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

To balance the interests in accessing the special litigation committee’s report in a derivative suit, the Court remanded for “(1) TPO to specifically identify privileged attorney-client communications and attorney work product contained within the SLC report; (2) the trial court to review in camera the revised redacted SLC report and privilege designations to determine whether the designated material is in fact privileged; (3) the trial court to then order the release of the revised SLC report not protected by privilege to the sibling shareholders; and (4) the trial court to issue a protective order preventing any party from disclosing the report’s (unredacted) contents.”

Ind. Dept. of State Revenue v. Caterpillar, Inc., No. 49S10-1402-TA-79, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 25, 2014).

August 28, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Company could not deduct foreign-source dividend income when calculating its net operating losses for Indiana tax purposes.

Ind. Patient’s Comp. Fund v. Holcomb, No. 49S05-1404-CC-209, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 26, 2014).

August 28, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Indiana’s Medical Malpractice Act’s cap on attorney fees from a Patient Compensation Fund award does not reduce the Fund’s liability.

Gonzalez v. Evans, No. 29A02-1311-DR-984. , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 19, 2014).

August 21, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Trial Rule 34(C)(3) permits non-parties to recover attorney fees associated with complying with a subpoena or other discovery request, but that refusing to comply with a discovery request solely on the basis that the parties cannot agree on an appropriate amount to pay does not constitute reasonable resistance to a discovery request.

SCI Propane, LLC v. Frederick, No. 55A04-1211-PL-586, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 13, 2014).

August 14, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Pyle

Defendants can recover attorney fees under the General Wrongful Death Statute.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 166
  • Go to page 167
  • Go to page 168
  • Go to page 169
  • Go to page 170
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 261
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs