It should have been considered a substantial and continuing change of circumstances when a woman receiving spousal maintenance now has substantial income and assets as a result of remarriage.
Civil
Fishers Adolescent Catholic Enrichment Society, Inc. v. Bridgewater, No. 93S02-1310-EX-704, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 6, 2015).
Disability discrimination claim must fail because the alleged discriminatory practice falls outside the authority of the Indiana Civil Rights Commission when it does not relate to education.
Rodriguez v U.S. Steel Corp., No. 45A04-1407-CT-350, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 31, 2014).
Company did not have a duty to the plaintiff when its employee fell asleep driving after his shift, crashing his car into the plaintiff.
In re B.C.H., No. 41S04-1408-AD-515, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 23, 2014).
Grandparents had “lawful custody” of child and should have been given notice of adoption proceedings and an opportunity to withhold consent to child’s adoption.
Rolley v. Rolley, No. 87S01-1412-DR-739, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 16, 2014).
Under Ind. Code § 31-16-8-1, an agreed child support order can be modified based on either a substantial and continuing change in circumstances or, after twelve months, a twenty percent deviation.