Trial court did not violate defendant’s due-process rights by requiring her to testify by signing to an interpreter.
Civil
Fischer v. Heymann, No. 49S02-1309-PL-620, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 17, 2014).
Responding to the plaintiff’s demand was not the defendant’s only option to mitigate damages, but the trial court was within its discretion to reduce damages.
Camoplast Crocker, LLC v. Magic Circle Corp., No. 29S02-1407-CT-476, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 21, 2014).
Plaintiff’s amendment of the complaint was proper when it was filed before the two-year limitation period expired, even though the court granted the motion to amend after the limitation period expired.
In re K.W., No. 49S02-1407-JT-458., __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 10, 2014).
The trial court abused it discretion by proceeding with a hearing and terminating parental rights in the parent’s absence when the parent was in jail.
Belcher v. Kroczek, No. 45A03-1311-CT-436 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 9, 2014).
Reputation, privacy, and identity are not chattel under T.R. 75(A)(2).