Clarifies conflicting footnote on a Petition for Rehearing.
Civil
Indiana Restorative Dentistry, P.C. v. Laven Insurance Agency, Inc., No. 49S05-1407-PL-491, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 12, 2015).
There are genuine issues of material fact regarding the existence of a special relationship between an insurance agent and the insured.
Kramer v. Kramer, No. 71S04-1503-PL-132, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 17, 2015).
Defendant committed a separate breach of contract for each transaction violating the non-competition clause.
Ball State University v. Irons, No. 45S03-1503-DR-134, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 18, 2015).
University should not have been added as a supplemental defendant in a woman’s petition to seek postsecondary expenses for her daughter.
Price v. Charles Brown Charitable Remainder Unitrust Trust, No. 74A01-1409-TR-401, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App. , March 18, 2015).
Although under a joint defense agreement privileged information was disclosed, it did not bar one party from suing the other; the “specific claims of privilege will need to be resolved as they are encountered in discovery or at trial.”