The patient’s designated expert medical testimony created a genuine issue of material fact regarding doctor’s negligence.
Civil
Kramer v. Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Inc., No. 71S03-1506-CT-350, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 3, 2015).
Because the applicable Indiana statute does not impose the requirement of a pre-placement registry check, and because the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that adoption agency had any duties in excess of its statutory obligations, summary judgment for the adoption agency was properly granted.
Byers v. Moredock, No. 34A04-1412-CT-560, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 18, 2015).
Property owners have no duty for damage done by tenant’s dog.
City of Fort Wayne v. Parrish, No. 02A05-1408-CT-359, __N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 19, 2015).
A violation of the Seatbelt Act may not be used to prove contributory negligence.
In re M.K., No. 49S02-1505-JC-260, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 12, 2015).
“Because the trial court’s remarks and conduct, in their cumulative effect, breached the court’s duty of impartiality and amounted to coercion of Father, we reverse the CHINS adjudication.”