• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Shelton v. Kroger LP I, No. 49A02-1601-CT-75, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 4, 2016).

August 8, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Pharmacy that filled a prescription for a drug that caused a fatal interaction was not a qualified health care provider under the Medical Malpractice Act and so it was not exempted from the Comparative Fault Act.

State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. v. Jakubowicz, N0. 45$05-1605-CT-00253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 26, 2016).

August 1, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

The insurance policy is ambiguous and must be construed in favor of the injured when the insurance policy provision requiring an insured to bring suit within three years is in direct conflict with the policy’s requirement that it will pay only if the underinsured motorist’s insurance has been exhausted.

Jay Classroom Teachers Ass’n. v. Jay School Corp., No. 49S05-1603-PL-113, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 21, 2016).

July 25, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, R. Rucker, Supreme

Given the deferential standard of review for agency action, the court upheld the Indiana Education Employment Relations Board factfinder’s decision.

In re Guardianship of Morris, No. No. 34A02-1510-GU-1809, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, July 12, 2016).

July 18, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

The trial court should consider the effect of a power of attorney when determining if the appointment of a guardian is necessary.

Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Co., No. 54A01-1506-CT-602, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App, July 13, 2016). (dissent on rehearing)

July 18, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Judge Baker dissents the denial of petition for rehearing; knowledge of a party’s immigration status alone sheds no meaningful light on the question of whether that party will one day face deportation.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 131
  • Go to page 132
  • Go to page 133
  • Go to page 134
  • Go to page 135
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs