• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

In re R.S., No. 49S04-1606-JT-350, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 16, 2016).

August 22, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Given the loving bond parent and child share, parent’s successful completion of multiple self-improvement and parenting courses, parent’s successful completion of probation, parent’s repeatedly expressed desire to parent child, and his exercise of regular visitation with child, the trial court’s findings do not clearly and convincingly support its conclusion that termination of parental rights is in the best interests of the child.

In re A.H., No. 49A04-1601-JC-42, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 18, 2016).

August 22, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

A CHINS adjudication is inappropriate when a parent is willing to provide care to the child without the coercive intervention of the court.

J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. v. Guardianship of Zak, No. 45A03-1506-CT-670, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 18, 2016).

August 22, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

Evidence of post-accident investigations is not automatically excluded as a subsequent remedial measure.

Gardenour v. Bondelie, No. 32A01-1601-DR-82, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2016).

August 15, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Same-sex couple’s California registered domestic partnership established a relationship virtually identical to marriage, and under the principle of comity, their relationship is a spousal relationship. Child born by artificial insemination was a child of the spousal relationship; trial court did not err in awarding joint legal custody and parenting time and ordering partner to pay child support.

Shelton v. Kroger LP I, No. 49A02-1601-CT-75, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 4, 2016).

August 8, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Pharmacy that filled a prescription for a drug that caused a fatal interaction was not a qualified health care provider under the Medical Malpractice Act and so it was not exempted from the Comparative Fault Act.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 124
  • Go to page 125
  • Go to page 126
  • Go to page 127
  • Go to page 128
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs