• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Dearman v. State, No. 19A-CR-2951, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 25, 2020).

March 30, 2020 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Najam, J.
Jermaine Dearman appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, as a Level 6 felony, following a bench trial. Dearman presents a single issue for our review, namely, whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction. We reverse
…
Dearman contends, and the State agrees, that his conviction on Count I must be vacated. At trial on Count I, the parties stipulated that Dearman possessed “vape cartridges containing THC hash oil.” Agreed Stipulation of Facts at 1.
Again, Dearman was charged and convicted under Indiana Code Section 35- 48-4-7, which provides in relevant part that:
(a) A person who, without a valid prescription or order of a practitioner acting in the course of the practitioner’s professional practice, knowingly or intentionally possesses a:
(1) controlled substance (pure or adulterated); or
(2) controlled substance analog (pure or adulterated);
classified in schedule I, II, III, or IV, except marijuana, hashish, or salvia, commits possession of a controlled substance, a Class A misdemeanor, except as provided in subsection (b).
(b) The offense is a Level 6 felony if the person commits the offense and an enhancing circumstance applies.
(Emphasis added). As the parties acknowledge on appeal, “marijuana” is defined in relevant part as “including hashish and hash oil.” I.C. § 35-48-1- 19(a). Thus, a defendant’s possession of hash oil is not a violation of Indiana Code Section 35-48-4-7
We hold that, because the undisputed evidence shows that Dearman possessed hash oil, his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, as a Level 6 felony, must be vacated.
Reversed.
Kirsch, J., and Brown, J., concur.
 

Read the full opinion

If the link to the opinion in this case isn’t available above, you can search for it at public.courts.in.gov/decisions

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs