Brown, J.
Jimmy Neal appeals and claims that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his convictions for dealing in or possessing a look-alike substance and dealing in marijuana as level 5 felonies, and that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering him to pay certain public defender fees and medical expenses. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
….
The State charged Neal as amended with: Count I, dealing or possessing a look alike substance as a level 5 felony; Count II, dealing in marijuana as a level 5 felony; Count III, operating a vehicle with a schedule I or II controlled substance or its metabolite in the body as a class C misdemeanor; Count IV, improper display of license plate as a class C infraction; and Count V, no operator’s license in possession as a class C infraction. It also filed a notice of intent to seek an enhanced penalty on Count II to raise the offense to a level 5 felony based on prior convictions in Wisconsin. The court held a bench trial and found Neal guilty on Counts I, II, and III and that judgment would be entered against him on Counts IV and V. With respect to Count I, the court stated “there was a quantity of those pills that were found,” they were “individually wrapped,” “they are a look-alike drug,” and “[m]aybe there weren’t an[y] comparisons, but you don’t have to take a leap of logic to assume that those are and were intended to be at one point passed off as drugs, so I’m going to find that you are guilty of Count I.” The court sentenced him to six years on Count I, six years on Count II, and sixty days on Count III, to run concurrently. The court’s written order states Neal is required to pay a public defender fee of $250 and that he “shall reimburse Marshall County for all medical care expenses incurred by the County in providing medical care to [him] pursuant to IC 11-12-5-7.”
The first issue is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain Neal’s convictions.
… Based upon the record, we conclude the State presented evidence of probative value from which the trier of fact could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Neal committed the crime charged under Count I. …
Neal next challenges his conviction for dealing in marijuana as a level 5 felony under Count II. …
… Based upon the record, we conclude the State presented evidence of probative value from which the trial court could find that Neal’s Wisconsin convictions constituted prior convictions for drug dealing offenses under Ind. Code § 35-48-4-10(d)(1).
The next issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering Neal to pay public defender fees and medical expenses. As to medical expenses, Neal argues the court did not give him notice before imposing the expenses, the court is required to consider an inmate’s ability to pay, he reported no cash or other assets at his initial hearing, and appellate counsel was appointed for him at sentencing. The record does not indicate a total amount he is required to pay, and Neal states has no idea what expenses are being sought. As to public defender fees, he argues the court abused its discretion by imposing a fee without a hearing, that he is indigent, and that the court imposed a $250 fee without indicating the statutory basis for doing so. The State concedes that there is uncertainty in the record regarding whether Neal is currently able to pay these fees and requests that this Court remand for further proceedings to determine his present ability to pay.
The trial court’s order states that Neal shall reimburse Marshall County for all medical care expenses incurred by the County under Ind. Code § 11-12-5-7, but does not specify a reimbursement amount. Ind. Code § 11-12-5-7(b) provides that “a court may order a county jail inmate to reimburse a county for all or a portion of medical care expenses incurred by the county in providing medical care to the inmate.” The statute expressly provides: “In determining the amount of reimbursement that an inmate may be required to pay under subsection (b), the court shall consider the inmate’s ability to pay.” Ind. Code § 11-12-5-7(d). It also provides that, if a court “orders a county jail inmate to reimburse a county for medical care expenses under subsection (b), the amount of the medical care expenses shall be reduced by the amount of any copayment the inmate was required to make,” Ind. Code § 11-12-5-7(e), and that, if a county incurs medical care expenses which are not reimbursed, it shall attempt to determine the amount that may be paid by a policy of insurance or Medicaid. See Ind. Code § 11-12-5-7(f). Further, the trial court’s order does not state a statutory basis for requiring Neal to pay a public defender fee. The court’s order did not indicate that it had inquired into or determined Neal’s ability to pay.
In light of the parties’ arguments and the record, we reverse the trial court’s order that Neal pay a public defender fee of $250 and reimburse Marshall County for medical expenses paid on his behalf and remand for hearing and further proceedings.
For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Neal’s convictions and remand for further proceedings consistent with Part II above.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
May, J., and Mathias, J., concur.