• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

CTB, Inc. v. Tunis, No. 17A-CT-3066, No. 49A02-1704-CT-776,__ N.E.3d __(Ind. Ct. App., March 5, 2018).

March 12, 2018 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Vaidik, C.J.
Case Summary
Indiana Trial Rule 75(A)(4) provides, in part, that preferred venue lies in the county where “the principal office of a defendant organization is located . . . .” Our Supreme Court has held that the term “principal office,” as used in the rule, “refers to a domestic or foreign corporation’s registered office in Indiana.” Am. Family Ins. v. Ford Motor Co., 857 N.E.2d 971, 972 (Ind. 2006). Under Indiana’s corporation law, a corporation’s registered office is the address of its registered agent.
….
On appeal, CTB argues that Kosciusko County is a preferred venue because that is where its “principal office” is located for purposes of Trial Rule 75(A)(4). The Tunises, on the other hand, contend that CTB has a principal office in Marion County because it has designated process agents there. We agree with CTB. A corporation’s “principal office,” for purposes of Trial Rule 75(A)(4), is its “registered office” under Indiana’s corporation law. Therefore, CTB’s principal office is in Kosciusko County. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
….
Reversed and remanded.
May, J., and Altice, J., concur.

Read the full opinion

If the link to the opinion in this case isn’t available above, you can search for it at public.courts.in.gov/decisions

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs