ROBB, Judge.
Vicky Tisdial, pro se, appeals the trial court’s issuance of an order for protection in favor of Christine Young. Tisdial raises multiple issues, but we find the following restated issue dispositive: whether sufficient evidence supports the order. Concluding there is no evidence of domestic or family violence, stalking, or a sex offense as required to support the order under Indiana Code chapter 34-26-5, we reverse.
. . . .
Although Young was understandably concerned regarding the possibility of future fights and reasonably sought legal recourse, we do not believe the general assembly intended orders for protection under the CPOA [“Civil Protection Order Act”] to serve as a remedy for a situation that entailed fighting between unrelated individuals. Although the facts in this case may well have entitled Young to some form of injunctive relief, they are insufficient to support the trial court’s order for protection issued under Indiana Code chapter 34-26-5. As a result, the order must be reversed.
Insufficient evidence supports the order for protection because there is no evidence of domestic violence, stalking, or a sex offense as required under Indiana Code chapter 34-26-5. The order is therefore reversed.
Reversed.
FRIEDLANDER, J., AND KIRSCH, J., concur.